Sunday, October 11, 2009

OWL Website


While looking through the Purdue OWL website that was designed for writing students, I saw that it could be an extremely helpful tool for anyone with their writing. There were few sections that would be really helpful for the GSR 102-01 class because it covered what we are learning now with a better description than that Lunsford et al. 2008 provides; structuring arguments, thesis, rhetorical analysis, and evidence. There also was English as a Second Language section which would be very helpful for students that are struggling with written English.
The website provides clear instructions and examples. For example, the thesis section is especially made to help writers make a strong, not feeble thesis for their writings. There are examples of typical mistakes writers make. What I really like about this is there are examples for each kind of mistakes, not just one general mistake. The explanations are clear, not too complicated. These are useful for me because making a strong, clear thesis is not one of my strengths. I might find myself visiting that certain section occasionally to improve my thesis.
The rhetorical analysis section explains the use of pathos, ethos, and logos in arguments. Lunsford et al. 2008 explains the importance of pathos, ethos, and logos but not as clear as OWL does. OWL explains more in depth, along with examples of dos and don’ts.
The research and evidence section was really important in my opinion. It showed the importance of the source of evidence, using evidence that best suits your audience. Evidence is based on the credibility of the source. OWL warns the use of Wikipedia on the internet, which is a popular source, for it is open to change by general viewers so it is not as accurate as sources from credible companies and writers. I personally tend to go to Wikipedia for sources. Now that I’ve read this, I will be trying to find other better sources.
The article I appreciated the most was the ESL (English as a Second Language) because I do struggle some with the grammar structure in writing. I was born almost profoundly deaf so sign language was my first language. English came later with my parent’s encouragement. This section provides grammar lessons that could improve understanding of the grammar structure for anyone, especially deaf people with sign language as their first language.
The OWL website in general would help Gallaudet students write their papers based on the Gallaudet University writing rubric because the main points of the rubric are citations, grammar, critical thinking, organization of ideas, and audience awareness. The OWL includes all these important points with a simple, depth explanation instead of the basics. This is why I recommend this website, it is very useful for this GSR 102-01 class and possibly for any papers that needs to be written in the future.

10 comments:

  1. I like the section for writers who used enlish as their second language. Also I agree wtih you that OWL explained about rhetorical analysis and Ethos Pathos n Logos very clear than Lusnford. I feel like we should use OWL instead Lunsford for the rest of semester!

    ReplyDelete
  2. When you said "The rhetorical analysis section explains the use of pathos, ethos, and logos in arguments. Lunsford et al. 2008 explains the importance of pathos, ethos, and logos but not as clear as OWL does. OWL explains more in depth, along with examples of dos and don’ts." I went and checked out this part in the website, and wow.. yes you're right. It was a lot more clear than in Lunsford.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love that you examined the examples. I know that for me to learn a complex concept, I have to see examples of the correct work (in math, I definitely need examples). Sometimes teachers, websites, tutors, etc give awful examples. The OWL website isn't one of those websites.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really enjoyed reading your blog among the others. I always know that it's going to be written with great points and once again, I was right. You never let your audience down! I particularly enjoyed the part where you applied your home languages to this, not everyone who is in Dr. Wood's class speak English as a first language. I am one of those students as well, my parents are French and they both sign American Sign Language and LSQ(French Sign Language) and familiarizing myself with three languages was difficult, so to learn English and to write it "perfectly" was a challenge for me throughout my years in Elementary school, however as I entered middle school, my writing skills began to pick up and they increased from that moment on. The OWL website is a wonderful way for students or anyone to improve their skills in writing!

    ReplyDelete
  5. i go to Wiki alot so now im gonna have to find other sources. your grammar is very good though. Overall this is a good blog.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You brought up a good point about Wikipedia. I am very disappointed that we couldn't use it as our source. That website is the best! It usually gives out the most information. Go Wikipedia!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have to admit I love Wikipedia.

    I'll have to check out the website again about the pathos, ethos, and logos again.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Loved how you included your personal experience in the piece. it made it more interesting than it already was. great job!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I know most people believe that Wikipedia is not credible enough to be used as factual source because it can be changed by every user in the world. But one thing they didn't realize about Wikipedia was that you have to confirm the original source to add the information first. Wikipedia has the sources at the bottom to verify if the information is true. So think about it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. One of the few blogs that the writer used himself/herself as an example, yours being profoundly deaf... good job.

    ReplyDelete